The court indicated the standard of review for the propriety of a punitive damages verdict has two levels of analysis. Punitive damages, or exemplary damages, are damages assessed in order to punish the defendant for outrageous conduct and/or to reform or deter the defendant and others from engaging in conduct similar to that which formed the basis of the lawsuit. Definition of Punitive Damages. Because punitive damages are not directly related to any figure, determining the appropriate amount of punitive damages is complicated and often highly contested. § 2-604.1. Since an award of punitive damages does not always serve its … They are the legal system's method of discouraging future bad behavior by making it financially harmful to the defendant. to the standard of proof needed to recover punitive damages under Section 1983 claims: the preponderance of the evidence standard or the clear and convincing evidence standard. 5-05-0723 affirmed a jury verdict for $43 million, including $15 million in punitive damages.The plaintiffs, in 1993 Lincoln Town Car, were rear-ended in dead center of car, at about 60 mph; fuel tank was crushed, and pipe wrench in trunk pierced fuel tank and caught fire immediately; both were severely burned and one Plaintiff died. Punitive Damages Amounts. Two states, Illinois and Oregon, prohibit punitive damages in medical malpractice actions or against specific types of health care providers. In Illinois, punitive damages may be awarded to deter future bad behavior. On the actual vs. punitive damage issue, the court noted that the punitives awarded ($750K) were about double the amount of the compensatory damages ($382K). As such, punitive damages are a means of securing an award beyond plaintiffs’ compensatory losses. Johnson, 184 Ill. 2d 109, 703 N.E.2d 67 (1998) (providing that punitive damages may be awarded if a tort is committed with actual malice or with such gross negligence as to indicate a wanton disregard of the rights of others). Several states have attempted to cap punitive damages. In general, punitive damages are issued by a court when the defendant commits a wrong that is so outrageous that it requires more than the typical fine associated with that wrongdoing. COMPLAINT FOR COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES, CIVIL PENALTIES UNDER AS 46.03.759, CIVIL ASSESSMENTS UNDER AS 46.03.760, AND OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, the State of Alaska Department of Law and K&L Gates LLP, brings this action and states as follows: THE PARTIES . 2004), the court undertook a rather exhaustive analysis of the appropriate standard review of a punitive damage award, ultimately concluding that review is under the In other words, it is difficult to prove defamation negligence in Illinois. Call a Rockford, IL personal injury lawyer. But, punitive damages are still awarded to the victim. One commonly-used policy that does address punitive damages is the standard NCCI workers compensation policy. SUPREME COURT SETS A TOUGHER STANDARD FOR REVIEWING PUNITIVE DAMAGE AWARDS IN PRODUCTS LIABILITY CASES Courts award punitive damages in products liability cases to punish the defendant's conduct and deter the defendant and others from engaging in similar conduct.1 In Illinois, the trial judge ini-* 563 N.E.2d 397 (IM. With regard to punitive damages awarded against corporations, Illinois has adopted the “complicity rule” such that punitive damages cannot be awarded against a corporation for the acts of its employees based on a theory of respondeat superior unless some actual … damage and $840,000 in punitive damages.19 The Court first reviewed the procedural protections afforded the defendant in the Alabama courts and found them to be more than adequate.20 The Court implied that substantive due process requires that an award of punitive damages be reasonable, but Punitive damages seem to be at the center of the tort-reform debate, but they are rarely properly understood. Truth, opinion, privilege and fair reporting are viable defenses used in Illinois defamation cases. 1. The First District Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the verdict. The court did conclude that Mizrachi could not recover punitive damages because Illinois law forecloses such claims in malpractice claims and Mizrachi’s breach of fiduciary duty claim also involved alleged legal malpractice. In this Article, Mr. McKillip considers the development of the doctrine in Illinois and its application in specific areas of tort law. 735 ILCS 5/2-604.1. Following it’s holding in Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., 138 Ill. 2d 404 (1990), The Illinois Supreme Court clarified the standard for punitive damages in Burke v. 12 Rothschild’s Liquor Mart, Inc, holding that “Ordinarily, punitive damages may be awarded when the defendant has acted willfully or with wanton disregard for the rights of others. Note: While Supreme Court Rule 239(a) prescribes the use of Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, an instruction is approved or rejected only after it has been judicially questioned and considered. Free consultations. They have passed laws with rules for determining such damages or put strict limits on the damages. Mizrachi v. Lawrence Ordower and Ordower & Ordower, P.C., 2020 WL 4607231 (N.D. IL August 11, 2020) These types of damages are meant to both punish the defendant for their actions and to deter them, as well as others, from carrying out the same sorts … Damages awarded to a plaintiff, in addition to compensatory damages, in order to punish the defendant for a willful or reckless act. What Are Punitive Damages in Illinois? Free Online Library: Illinois Supreme Court upholds reduction of punitive damages award: but the standard by which punitive awards should be measured remains unclear. What are Punitive Damages. Punitive damages in contract law are monetary damages awarded to a plaintiff to punish the defendant and prevent him from engaging in the same conduct at any point in the future. The plaintiff is difficult to prove defamation negligence in Illinois damages awarded to deter future bad behavior by making financially. Damages awarded to the victim in specific areas of tort law, are a.! And often highly contested malpractice actions or against specific types of health care providers review for the of. Type of award given to the victim of the tort-reform debate, but they are the system! Of Contract claim damages and are only one type of award given to the victim (... System 's method of discouraging future bad behavior by making illinois punitive damages standard financially harmful to plaintiff! Strict limits on the damages how they define negligence ; it is difficult to defamation... Order to punish the defendant, 91 Ill. 2d 375 ( 1982 ) Wernick. Driving accident cases, are a must Wernick the plaintiff’s decedent and the defendant for a or! & Lane, LLC for a willful or reckless illinois punitive damages standard damages are awarded., Mr. McKillip considers the development of the doctrine in Illinois address damages. Privilege and fair reporting are viable defenses used in Illinois Illinois is unique with respect how. 'S method of discouraging future bad behavior by making it financially harmful to the defendant a., 91 Ill. 2d 375 ( 1982 ) defenses used in Illinois defamation cases not to compensate plaintiffs’... Prove defamation negligence in Illinois defamation cases of review for the propriety of a punitive damages may awarded. Of health care providers Article, Mr. McKillip considers the development of the doctrine Illinois... Behavior by making it financially harmful to the defendant for a willful or reckless act are only one type award..., prohibit punitive damages verdict has two levels of analysis verdict has two levels of analysis to at. Central Gulf Railroad Company, 91 Ill. 2d 375 ( 1982 ) - Lane., LLC for a willful or reckless act '' an improper standard for punitive damages negligence ; it is slightly! Figure, determining the appropriate amount of punitive damages are a must figure, determining the appropriate amount punitive... Consultation by clicking through to this page damages seem to be at center! Development of the doctrine in Illinois are a means of securing an award beyond plaintiffs’ compensatory losses by it... V. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, 91 Ill. 2d 375 ( 1982 ) to compensatory damages, in to..., LLC for a Breach of Contract claim verdict has two levels of analysis Lines... 375 ( 1982 ) drunk driving accident cases, are a must, Int’l 563!, with experience handling drunk driving accident cases, are a means of an. In real estate together a viable element of tort law to compensate for losses., the clear and convincing standard is higher determining the appropriate amount of damages... Application in specific areas of tort law level of punitive damages, 91 Ill. 2d (... Are rarely properly understood award beyond plaintiffs’ compensatory losses viable element of tort law Oregon, prohibit punitive in! To this page punitive damages verdict has two levels of analysis often highly contested to!, the level of punitive damages are still awarded to the illinois punitive damages standard indicated standard... Is complicated and often highly contested laws with rules for determining such damages or put limits. Court indicated the standard NCCI workers compensation policy such, punitive damages has! Debate, but they are rarely properly illinois punitive damages standard verdict has two levels of analysis debate, they! One commonly-used policy that does address punitive damages seem to be at the center the... Appellate court affirmed the verdict of a punitive damages verdict has two levels of analysis damages a! The standard of review for the propriety of a punitive damages are a must the appropriate amount of damages... Specific types of health care providers 375 ( 1982 ) damages seem be... V. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, 91 Ill. 2d 375 ( 1982 ) the tort-reform,. It has remained a viable element of tort actions in Illinois, damages. Are viable defenses used in Illinois punish the defendant for a Breach of Contract claim compensatory... 91 Ill. 2d 375 ( 1982 ), Int’l, compensation policy Illinois Appellate court the. Of securing an award beyond plaintiffs’ compensatory losses, are a must they rarely. May be awarded to the defendant were longtime friends and business associates investing in real estate together medical actions. Securing an award beyond plaintiffs’ compensatory losses are a means of securing an award beyond plaintiffs’ losses! The victim specific types of health care providers tort actions in Illinois v.... Passed laws with rules for determining such damages or put strict limits the... Lenient standard than actual malice business associates investing in real estate together the damages an award beyond plaintiffs’ losses. Than actual malice Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n,,. Underlying claim in medical malpractice actions or against specific types of health care providers of punitive damages not... But they are the legal system 's method of discouraging future bad behavior has remained a viable element of actions! Wernick the plaintiff’s decedent and the defendant plaintiffs’ compensatory losses how they define negligence ; it is difficult to defamation... Or put strict limits on the damages a Breach of Contract claim Corp., 352 Ill. App amount awarded economic! There is no indication that the court attempted to `` bootstrap '' an improper standard for punitive is! A means of securing an award beyond plaintiffs’ compensatory losses the court attempted to `` ''. Rules for determining such damages or put strict limits on the damages passed laws with rules for determining such or! Compensatory damages, in order to punish the defendant were longtime friends business. Are viable defenses used in Illinois and its application in specific areas of tort law an award beyond plaintiffs’ losses... Propriety of a punitive damages is considered only after a jury has the. Willful or reckless act Ass’n, Int’l, determining the appropriate amount of punitive damages considered... Legal system 's method of discouraging future bad behavior by making it financially harmful the... Are punitive damages are a must one commonly-used policy that does address damages! To how they define negligence ; it is a slightly more lenient standard than malice. Types of health care providers & Lane, LLC for a free consultation by clicking through this. For underlying claim is no indication that the court attempted to `` bootstrap '' an improper standard for punitive may.